Qitzur Shulchan Arukh – 66:1

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
א: הַנּוֹתֵן לַחֲבֵרוֹ מָעוֹת שֶׁיִּתְעַסֵּק בָּהֶן וְהָרֶוַח יִהְיֶה לַחֲצָאִין, וְגַם הַהֶפְסֵד יִהְיֶה עַל שְׁנֵיהֶם בְּשָׁוֶה, זֶהוּ נִקְרָא עִסְקָא וְאָסוּר, מִפְּנֵי כִּי הַחֲצִי מִמָּעוֹת אֵלּוּ הִיא מִלְוֶה בְּיַד הַמְקַבֵּל, שֶׁהֲרֵי הִיא בָּאַחְרָיוּת שֶׁלּוֹ וְהוּא נוֹטֵל אֶת הָרֶוַח, וְגַם הַהֶפְסֵד עָלָיו. וְהַחֲצִי הוּא פִּקָּדוֹן אֶצְלוֹ, שֶׁהֲרֵי הוּא בְּאַחְרָיוּת הַנּוֹתֵן, וְהוּא לוֹקֵחַ אֶת הָרֶוַח מֵחֲצִי זֶה, וְגַם הַהֶפְסֵד מֵחֲצִי זֶה עָלָיו. וְהַמְקַבֵּל שֶׁהוּא מִתְעַסֵק וְטוֹרֵחַ בַּחֲצִי הַפִּקָּדוֹן שֶׁהוּא שַׁיָּךְ לְהַנּוֹתֵן, זֶהוּ רַק מִפְּנֵי שֶׁנּוֹתֵן לוֹ אֶת הַחֲצִי בְּהַלְוָאָה, וַהֲרֵי רִבִּית וְאָסוּר. וְיֵשׁ הֶתֵּר לָזֶה, אִם הַנּוֹתֵן נוֹתֵן לְהַמְקַבֵּל אֵיזֶה שָׂכָר בִּשְׁבִיל הֶעָמָל וְהַטֹּרַח שֶׁהוּא מִתְעַסֵּק בְּחֶלְקוֹ. וְיֵשׁ לִקְצוֹץ, אוֹ שֶׁיִּתֵּן לוֹ מִיָּד בִּשְׁעַת נְתִינַת הַמָּעוֹת שְׂכָרוֹ. וְדַי אֲפִלּוּ בְּדָבָר מוּעָט – קעז

If someone gives his friend money as an investment, such that the profits will be divided in halves [between them] and the losses will also be upon them equally,this is called an iska [a business agreement], and is prohibited.

[The reason is] because half of the money is [effectively] a loan held by the recipient, because he is responsible for it — he gets [a share of] the profit, and the losses are also his. And the other half is [effectively] a deposit with him, because it is the responsibility of the investor — who gets his profit from this half, and any losses from this half are also his. The recipient, who busies himself and troubles himself with the half [that is a] deposit belonging the investor, it is only because of the half which was given to him as a loan. This is considered as interest and is forbidden.

There is a way to do this permissably: if the investor gives to the recipient payment for the work and effort which he busies himself on his [the investor’s] portion. One set a fixed salary, or should pay him at the same time as giving the money. Even if it’s a small amount, it’s enough.

By the rules we derived from the last siman, the person who loses if the money is lost is it’s owner. So, partners who share profits and loss are each owners of part of the money, according to their percentages of the risk. Therefore, doing business for a partner’s share of the money is benefit to the partner. And if the working partner’s only payment is the profit or loss, then he is giving that benefit in exchange for the loan of money that is his share. Which would be prohibited as ribis.

If he is paid, even a nominal amount, then he is an employee of the backing investor, and doing the work for that pay. The work isn’t tied to the percentage of the capital whose loss would be from his account, and thus permitted.

And your thoughts...?

  1. Pingback: Aspaqlaria » Blog Archive » Qitzur Shulchan Arukh – 66:4

  2. Pingback: Qitzur Shulchan Arukh – 66:1 | JewPI