Avodah Mailing List
Volume 07 : Number 083
Monday, August 6 2001
Subjects Discussed In This Issue:
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:27:34 -0400
From: Gershon Dubin <email@example.com>
Subject: Mikve, Shitas Ba'al Hatanya
Apropos of an Areivim discussion (*) that a mikva built to shitas ba'al
haTanya would cause halachic problems, I'd be interested to know the
specifics. I had heard more than once that mikvaos were built to include
as many shitos, even deios yachid, as possible without self-contradiction.
(*) Agav, I find it very satisfying when an Areivim discussion slides
into an Avodah discussion, and we may give ourselves a collective pat
on the back for the tendency. (Reverse slides not considered here <g>)
Go to top.
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 16:27:30 -0400
From: "Feldman, Mark" <MFeldman@CM-P.COM>
Subject: RE: real ROY and sophistication in halachah
From: S. Goldstein [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Several weeks ago a discussion was recorded between two ladies regarding
> hair covering. One claimed that a shaitel plus hat was Rav Ovadia
> Yosef's opinion of proper hair covering. The second one claimed that
> only a tichel/mitpachat is acceptable according to his opinion.
> Therefore, even though ROY summarizes quite clearly in favor of simply
> a tichel/mitpachat, his logic in doing so does not exclude a shaitel
> plus hat.
Unless you specifically accept my chiddush, why is this necessarily true?
If a sheitel violates das yehudis and a hat partially covering the head
violates das yehudis, why does the combination of the two not violate das
Go to top.
[ Distributed to the Avodah mailing list, digested version. ]
[ To post: mail to email@example.com ]
[ For back issues: mail "get avodah-digest vXX.nYYY" to firstname.lastname@example.org ]
[ or, the archive can be found at http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/ ]
[ For general requests: mail the word "help" to email@example.com ]